There is a man who plays with a hard ball. He wants to marry a woman
who plays with a soft ball. He hits hard balls, she hits soft balls.
Sounds like they will be a compatible couple. Perfect match. But there
is a problem.
There is another woman who plays with no balls, but she
wants the man who plays with hard balls. Apparently, one of them is a
slime ball. But I don't have a crystal ball to know who the wrong guy
is...
I know it's confusing you. So, let me be a be clear. I am
talking
about Pakistan cricketer Shoaib Malik who has courted a lot of
controversies over his plans to marry tennis player Sania Mirza. I am
not recapitulating the controversy here. Contact Googleshwar for help. Many newspapers and
news channels are dying to give you more and more information on their
relationship and their past affairs.
I spend about an hour looking
for Shoaib's handwriting sample. I could not find it. But after an long
search, I bumped into his signature. So, I thought I must share with
you a few
things that I noticed about the strokes in his signature.
Click here to view his signature in a
hi-res
file.
Does
he hide his real self? By looking at just the signature, can
you tell it is Shoaib's? I don't think so. It means that his signature
is illegible. That's the first thing that hits my eyes. The random
scribble shows that Malik has an internal need to remain unknown to
people around him. He won't like to discuss his plans and keeps things
to himself. The truth about his life may remain unknown for a long time.
An illegible writer also feels he is misunderstood by his own people.
Is
he a story teller? Some people say that Shoaib's version of
the story has been cooked up by him. I really don't know what the truth
is. But the unnecessary loops coupled with unbroken garland connection
between letters in his signature suggest that mentally (as opposed to
sexually), he is quite imaginative and is able to connect his thoughts
with remarkable ease. If all these traits are necessary to make someone a
good story-teller, then yes, Shoaib is a good story-teller. (Stop
smiling... this is no verdict on Shoaib's chastity.)
Loops
inside a & o: Shoaib Malik has in his name two 'a' and
one 'o' — the letters of communication. But in his signature, both the
letters are malformed, which indicates that there is some problem with
the way he communicates. Writers with malformed 'a' and 'o' have a
tendency to manipulate facts to suit their needs.
Ovals
open at bottom: Shoaib uses a circles in place
of i-dots . The
circles are open from down. This suggests the writer inclination to
indulge in underhand activities. Some handwriting analysts say an open
also oval in handwriting shows the writer is dishonest.
Sania's
signature
I found just one
sample of Sania's signature on Internet. Her
signature, like Shoaib's, is illegible. Also, it's scribbled.
Scribbled
signature: Such writers are always in a hurry. There are
two reasons they scribble. One, their mind is faster than their hands.
And second, they are hoity-toity rascals who tell others: I don’t care
whether you can read my handwriting or not. I am just too busy to be
bothered by that. I have no time for you…” Such writers seldom take
total responsibility for things in their lives.
I can't say more
about her from this signature alone.
Want to get the analyses of
famous people's handwriting as soon as
they are published on Write Choice? Click here
Article Rating (3 stars):
- Article Word Count: 657
- |
- Total Views: 487
- |
- permalink